top of page

OnRequest Auto IntelliDents

logo.png

🚧 Article 2: Why Traditional Fleet Accident Processes No Longer Work

  • Peter Adams
  • Jan 27
  • 3 min read

The systems fleets relied on for decades are now the very things slowing them down.

For years, accident management followed a predictable pattern: wait for someone to inspect the vehicle, send it to a local repairer, hope the assessor is available, and accept that downtime is ā€œjust part of the process.ā€


Emails, phone calls, follow‑ups, spreadsheets, photos, status checks — the admin burden around a single incident can be a challenge!
Emails, phone calls, follow‑ups, spreadsheets, photos, status checks — the admin burden around a single incident can be a challenge!

That model made sense when fleets were smaller, customer expectations were lower, and operational pressure was lighter. But today, across New Zealand and Australia, fleets are operating in a completely different environment — and the old processes simply can’t keep up.


The First 24 Hours Are Now Make‑or‑Break... when an incident occurs, the clock starts immediately.

  • Negligent third parties "disappear".

  • Customers still expect deliveries.

  • Teams still need vehicles.

  • Operations don’t pause.


Yet traditional processes introduce friction at the exact moment fleets need clarity and speed. The result is a cascade of delays that inflate cost, extend downtime, and frustrate everyone involved.


It begins with the selection of fleet vehicles - purchasing based on "best price" may look great on paper... however you can easily add another 6 to 12 weeks to a repair time when key collision repair parts are many thousands of kms away in another country.


Let’s break down where the old model is failing:


1. Manual Inspections Slow Everything Down

The collision repair industry still relies heavily on someone physically viewing the vehicle before anything can progress. This creates unavoidable delays:

  • Waiting for availability

  • Travel time

  • Scheduling conflicts

  • Weather, location and coordination/logistical constraints


In a world where fleets need instant triage, manual inspection is often the biggest bottleneck.


2. Repair Allocation Is Fragmented and Inconsistent

Most fleets still depend on ad‑hoc repair relationships or local networks. This leads to:

  • Variable repair quality

  • Unpredictable turnaround times

  • Limited coverage across regions

  • No standardised communication


When a vehicle is damaged out in the car park or hundreds of kilometres from head office, the process becomes even more chaotic.


3. Assessing Capacity Hasn’t Kept Pace With Fleet Growth

Assessors are stretched thin across New Zealand and Australia. Traditional workflows mean fleets often wait days or weeks for:

  • Damage validation

  • Repair approval

  • Cost confirmation and booking slot availability

  • Dispute resolution


Every day of waiting compounds downtime — and downtime is now the most expensive part of an accident.


4. The Administrative Load Has Become Unsustainable

Emails, phone calls, follow‑ups, spreadsheets, photos, status checks — the admin burden around a single incident is challenging. Multiply that across a fleet, and the operational drag becomes significant. Traditional processes weren’t designed for:

  • High‑volume fleets

  • Real‑time visibility

  • Cross‑border operations

  • Modern customer expectations


The gap between what fleets need and what legacy systems can deliver is widening.


5. Data Is Missing, Incomplete, or Too Slow to Be Useful

Accident data is often scattered across:

  • Repairers

  • Assessors

  • Internal teams

  • Insurers


By the time it’s consolidated, the opportunity to reduce cost or prevent future incidents has already passed. Modern fleets want and need actionable insights — not historical reports.


The Industry Has Outgrown Its Old Tools


The traditional accident‑management model wasn’t built for:

  • AI‑driven operations

  • National fleet coverage

  • Tight delivery windows

  • Rising customer expectations

  • Cross‑country consistency

  • Real‑time decision‑making


Fleets need a system that is faster, clearer, and more connected. And that’s exactly where the next evolution begins.


What’s Coming Next


In my next article, I’ll cover how AI‑powered remote inspections are transforming incident management — and why this shift is becoming the new standard for fleets across New Zealand and Australia. If you’re responsible for fleet performance, this is where the real change starts. Need a heads up... intellidents.online


Ā 
Ā 
Ā 

Comments


bottom of page